Euro 2024: Vote on England selection options ahead of Slovenia as Gareth Southgate searches for solutions | Football News

Euro 2024: Vote on England selection options ahead of Slovenia as Gareth Southgate searches for solutions | Football News


Gareth Southgate has plenty of problems. So what are the solutions?

England may be top of Group C and unbeaten at Euro 2024 but their 1-1 draw with Denmark on Thursday evening was an alarming performance.

From the physical condition of the players to their tactical set-up and out-of-possession pressing, there were concerns across the pitch.

A place in the knockouts is all but assured but England need a significant gear shift if they’re to have an impact in the latter stages of this tournament.

Here are some of the options Southgate could turn to for the final group game on Tuesday against Slovenia, where he’ll hope to kick-start this spluttering England campaign. Take a look and then vote for your favourite…

1) Re-shape the midfield

After seeing England’s midfield fail to click so badly against Denmark, it seems obvious Trent Alexander-Arnold won’t play there against Slovenia. That experiment is on hold. Could Southgate also take the opportunity to completely restructure his set-up in that area and go to a three-man midfield? If so, Conor Gallagher – Alexander-Arnold’s replacement in both games so far – would be likely to come in alongside Declan Rice and Jude Bellingham.

2) Re-shape the midfield and drop Foden

If Alexander-Arnold has been one target of criticism so far, then the performances of Phil Foden have also been under fire. The Manchester City ace may have hit the post against Denmark and performed better than he did against Serbia but he continues to search for his best form in an England shirt. Is it time to give Anthony Gordon a chance to stretch his legs and stretch the opposition defence? Or give Cole Palmer the opportunity to reproduce his Premier League goal-scoring feats on the international stage?

3) Time to turn to Palmer?

Or could Palmer simply have an impact by slotting into the current set-up, with Bellingham feeding him from the No10 position?

4) Get fan favourites Mainoo and Palmer in

Palmer’s name has been trending on social media after both of England’s games so far. And so has Kobbie Mainoo’s. Southgate isn’t usually one to bow to public pressure but he could give England fans what they want by fielding them both against Slovenia. Mainoo may be the answer to England’s midfield conundrum.

5) Gordon on the wing, Mainoo in midfield

With Rice and Mainoo offering protection, would Gordon offer a better out-ball than Palmer?

6) Bench Kane AND Bellingham!

Southgate’s decision to sub off Kane against Denmark was justified but it’s always a shock to see the captain and top scorer withdrawn. There was also a case to take off a tired-looking Jude Bellingham but the golden boy played the full 90 minutes. If Southgate wants both of his key men firing at 100 per cent for the knockout rounds, could he be so bold as to rest them against Slovenia and make the most of his many attacking options in this squad?

7) Give Kane a strike partner

Perhaps Kane just needs some support up top. How about playing Ollie Watkins alongside him to provide the running in behind?

The final Group C fixtures

England vs Slovenia (Cologne, kick-off 8pm UK time)
Denmark vs Serbia (Munich, kick-off 8pm UK time)

VAR: Premier League clubs to vote on whether to keep or scrap video assistant referee in Thursday’s Annual General Meeting | Football News



The future of VAR is on the agenda as Premier League clubs meet for their Annual General Meeting (AGM) on Thursday morning.

All 20 top-flight clubs will meet to decide whether to abolish VAR after Wolves called for a vote to get rid of it.

Wolves have been on the end of several controversial refereeing decisions this season and believe the decision review system is “undermining the value of the Premier League brand”.

It is not expected that clubs will come close to receiving the 14 votes required to scrap it. The majority of clubs favour VAR but want improvements made to it.

Premier League stats earlier this season showed correct decisions had increased from 82 to 96 per cent under VAR, with Tony Scholes, the Premier League’s chief football officer, telling Sky Sports in February: “VAR is, and remains, a very effective tool in supporting the match officials on the pitch.”

However, Scholes did also admit: “We are doing too many checks, we’re taking too long in doing them as well. It’s to a degree understandable, given the level of scrutiny these guys are under.

Premier League managers have their say on the question of whether or not the league should stick with VAR

“But the reviews are taking too long and it’s affecting the flow of the game and we’re extremely aware of that and the need to improve that speed while always maintaining the accuracy.”

In Thursday’s meeting, PGMOL chief Howard Webb and Scholes will outline six areas in which they will seek to improve upon VAR moving forward this coming season.

What else is being discussed at the Premier League AGM?

New clubs sworn in: The first point on the agenda at the Premier League meeting is the newly promoted clubs – Leicester City, Ipswich and Southampton – will officially be confirmed as Premier League clubs.

All three will receive their single share, giving them an equal vote on all matters.

Anchoring to be introduced: Clubs will wave through plans for a new “anchoring” system to run in shadow in 2024/25.

What is ‘anchoring’?

In its purest and simple form, anchoring means all clubs would only be able to spend a maximum of the multiple of what the bottom club earns in TV revenue.

At the moment, the bottom club gets £103.6m. If the anchoring multiple, and this has been discussed, is going to be 4.5, then you would do £103.6m x 4.5, which results in £466m.

So £466m would be the spending cap in that instance. That is the maximum cap on what clubs would be allowed to spend on wages, amortised transfer fees and also agent fees.

The details are still to be ironed out, so the multiple may not necessarily be 4.5. This is what is being worked on at the moment.

There will be no punishment for any financial breach of this system within this period. However, clubs can still expect to be charged if they fall foul of the current Profit & Sustainability rules (PSR).

This shadow period will allow time for the system to be evaluated and for the PFA to be consulted. The PFA are concerned about a hard salary cap being introduced.

There will not be a vote on whether it will be fully introduced for the 2025/26 season at this stage.

Two PSR Votes: Two potential amendments to the current PSR rules for this coming campaign will be voted on but are unlikely to be approved by clubs.

  • First proposed amendment: Aston Villa wish to raise the upper threshold for permitted losses over a three-year period from £105m to £135m.
  • Second proposed amendment: Crystal Palace have proposed an alternative amendment to raise the permitted lost limit.

Crystal Palace co-owner John Textor has called for changes to the spending restrictions placed on Premier League clubs. (Video courtesy of Financial Times)

Palace’s idea is to alter PSR rules to allow clubs in Europe to claim the difference in UEFA coefficient funding between themselves and the top clubs in the division as allowable losses.

Current UEFA coefficient payments are based on a club’s last 10 years of performances in Europe and therefore benefit traditional elite clubs and disadvantage recent qualifiers – such as Villa.

Will Man City’s legal case against the Premier League be discussed?

As Sky Sports News reported on Wednesday, it is very unlikely Manchester City’s unprecedented legal challenge against the Premier League will be on the agenda.

However, it’s likely to be a hot topic of discussion among executives outside the formal meeting room.

Read more on Man City vs the Premier League…